**THE FABRIC of the COSMOS,****Brian Greene,**2004

```(annotated and with added

**bold highlights by Epsilon=One**)

**Chapter 11 - Quanta in the Sky with Diamonds**

Inflation, Smoothness, and the Arrow of Time

Perhaps my enthusiasm has already betrayed my bias, but of all the progress that science has achieved in our age, advances in cosmology fill me with the greatest awe and humility. I seem never to have lost the rush I initially felt years ago when I first read up on the basics of general relativity and realized that from our tiny little corner of spacetime we can apply Einstein's theory to learn about the evolution of the entire cosmos. Now, a few decades later, technological progress is subjecting these once abstract proposals for how the universe behaved in its earliest moments to observational tests, and the theories

Recall, though, that besides cosmology's overall relevance to the story of space and time, Chapters 6 and 7 launched us into a study of the universe's early history with a specific goal: to find the origin of time's arrow. Remember from those chapters that

Inflationary cosmology offers substantial progress, but let me first remind you more precisely of the puzzle, in case any of the relevant details have slipped your mind.

There is strong evidence and little doubt that, early in the history of the universe, matter was spread uniformly throughout space. Ordinarily, this would be characterized as a high-entropy configuration — like the carbon dioxide molecules from a bottle of Coke being spread uniformly throughout a room — and hence would be so commonplace that it would hardly require an explanation. But when gravity Matters, as it does when considering the entire universe, a uniform distribution pf matter is a rare, low-entropy, highly ordered configuration, because gravity drives matter to form clumps. Similarly, a smooth and uniform spatial curvature also has very low entropy; it is highly ordered compared with a wildly bumpy, nonuniform spatial curvature. (Just as there are many ways for the pages of [I]War and Peace[I] to be disordered but only one way for them to be ordered, so there are

As first discussed in detail by Paul Davies and Don Page,

But note the following: this reasoning relies completely on the

Thus, by the end of the inflationary burst, the size of the universe had grown fantastically, any nonuniformity in the curvature of space had been stretched away, and any initial clumps of anything at all had been diluted to the point of irrelevance. Moreover, as the inflaton field slid down to the bottom of its potential-energy bowl, bringing the burst of inflationary expansion to a close, it converted its pent-up energy into a nearly uniform bath of particles of ordinary matter throughout space (uniform up to the tiny but critical inhomogeneities coming from quantum jitters). In total, this all sounds like great progress. The outcome we've reached via inflation —

*really work.*Recall, though, that besides cosmology's overall relevance to the story of space and time, Chapters 6 and 7 launched us into a study of the universe's early history with a specific goal: to find the origin of time's arrow. Remember from those chapters that

**the only convincing framework we found for explaining time's arrow was that the early universe had extremely high order**, that is, extremely low entropy, which set the stage for a future in which**entropy got ever larger**. Just as the pages of*War and Peace*wouldn't have had the capacity to get increasingly jumbled if they had not been nice and ordered at some point, so too the universe wouldn't have had the capacity to get increasingly disordered — milk spilling, eggs breaking, people aging — unless it had been in a highly ordered configuration early on.**The puzzle we encountered is to explain how this high-order, low-entropy starting point came to be.**Inflationary cosmology offers substantial progress, but let me first remind you more precisely of the puzzle, in case any of the relevant details have slipped your mind.

There is strong evidence and little doubt that, early in the history of the universe, matter was spread uniformly throughout space. Ordinarily, this would be characterized as a high-entropy configuration — like the carbon dioxide molecules from a bottle of Coke being spread uniformly throughout a room — and hence would be so commonplace that it would hardly require an explanation. But when gravity Matters, as it does when considering the entire universe, a uniform distribution pf matter is a rare, low-entropy, highly ordered configuration, because gravity drives matter to form clumps. Similarly, a smooth and uniform spatial curvature also has very low entropy; it is highly ordered compared with a wildly bumpy, nonuniform spatial curvature. (Just as there are many ways for the pages of [I]War and Peace[I] to be disordered but only one way for them to be ordered, so there are

*many*ways for space to have a disordered, nonuniform shape, but very few ways in which it can be fully ordered, smooth, and uniform.) So we are left to puzzle:**Why did the early universe have a low-entropy (highly ordered) uniform distribution of matter instead of a high-entropy (highly disordered) clumpy distribution of matter such as a diverse population of black holes? And why was the curvature of space smooth, ordered, and uniform to extremely high accuracy rather than being riddled with a variety of huge warps and severe curves, also like those generated by black holes?**As first discussed in detail by Paul Davies and Don Page,

**inflationary cosmology gives important insight into these issues. To see how, bear in mind that an essential assumption of the puzzle is that once a clump forms here or there, its greater gravitational pull attracts yet more material, causing it to grow larger; correspondingly, once a wrinkle in space forms here or there, its greater gravitational pull tends to make the wrinkle yet more severe, leading to a bumpy, highly nonuniform spatial curvature. When gravity matters, ordinary, unremarkable, high-entropy configurations are lumpy and bumpy.***3*But note the following: this reasoning relies completely on the

*attractive*nature of ordinary gravity. Lumps and bumps grow because they pull strongly on nearby material, coaxing such material to join the lump. During the brief inflationary phase, though, gravity was*repulsive*and that changed everything.**Take the shape of space. The enormous outward push of repulsive gravity drove space to swell**so swiftly that initial bumps and warps were stretched smooth, much as fully inflating a shriveled balloon stretches out its creased surface.*****What's more, since the volume of space increased by a colossal factor during the brief inflationary period, the density of any clumps of matter was completely diluted, much as the density of fish in your aquarium would be diluted if the tank's volume suddenly increased to that of an Olympic swimming pool. Thus, although attractive gravity causes clumps of matter and creases of space to grow, repulsive gravity does the opposite: it causes them to diminish, leading to an ever smoother, ever more uniform outcome.Thus, by the end of the inflationary burst, the size of the universe had grown fantastically, any nonuniformity in the curvature of space had been stretched away, and any initial clumps of anything at all had been diluted to the point of irrelevance. Moreover, as the inflaton field slid down to the bottom of its potential-energy bowl, bringing the burst of inflationary expansion to a close, it converted its pent-up energy into a nearly uniform bath of particles of ordinary matter throughout space (uniform up to the tiny but critical inhomogeneities coming from quantum jitters). In total, this all sounds like great progress. The outcome we've reached via inflation —

*a smooth, uniform spatial expansion populated by a nearly uniform distribution of matter*— was exactly what we were trying to explain. It's exactly the low-entropy configuration that we need to explain time's arrow.*****Don't get confused here: The inflationary stretching of quantum jitters discussed in the last section still produced a minuscule, unavoidable nonuniformity of about 1 part in 100,000. But that tiny nonuniformity overlaid an otherwise smooth universe. We are now describing how the latter — the underlying smooth uniformity — came to be.