Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Dyosphere

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Dyosphere

    The Dyosphere

    Dyosphere (Dynamic, Oscillating Spheroids) is a neologism that refers to the totality of quanticized space (QS). Quanticized space (QS) is what is colloquially referred to as “space.”

    Dyosphere is particularly distinguished from “space” in that Dyosphere specifically connotes the composition of "space" rather than a quality of “emptiness.” (Some persons might use the terms "medium" or “field” or "ether" as connoting that “space” that has properties other than “empty.”)

    Pulsoids and Taisoids, heuristically, describe the Unimetry of the Dyosphere that can be said to be analogous to the coalescing bubbles of a foam.

    Space is not empty or continuous.
    Space is quanticized.

    Quanticized space is the essence of fundamental, hyper-relativistic “dark” energy. Emptiness connotes an absolute. An absolute is a singularity. A singularity does not exist. (See: Infinity) Space exists.

    There is no place within Reality that "something" does not exist. Said "something" can be thought of as a complex wave manifestation in the manner of Triquametric motion and, heuristically, Tini Circle Groups (TCG).

    The first manifestation of seminal motion is space.

    The space quantum is the first manifestation of seminal motion’sevolution to Triquametric motion (TM) at the separation of a dimensionless point within a dimensionless sphere (DES).

    Seminal motion stops when its hyper-relativistic motion, often referred to as “dark” energy, is transferred to a Resoloid, which is the result of complex resonance that is created by the sliding, swinging, vibrating oscillations of Triquametric motion (TM).

    Heuristically, the Unimetry of evolved Triquametric motion results in the shape of quanticized space as a dynamic Emergent Ellipsoid (EEd); with spherical internal, resonance phenomena that is referred to as Resoloids. A Resoloid can be thought of as the turbulence of “dark” energy that is shaped by complex oscillations.

    QS is compressible; and its Resoloids manifest as mass; thus, “dark” matter because it does not emanate Light. Or, transparent matter; as, it does not reflect Light.

    The properties of energy, space, and matter are closely interrelated at the very most fundamental level of existence, which is seminal motion.

    Properties closely associated with “space” (QS) are the orthogonal dimensions, the Inverse square Law, “energy fields,” and hyper-relativistic non-locality. These properties are primarily established by Triquametric motion and its subsequent pulsing effects.

    Properties associated with Resoloids constitute the “clock” of fundamental intrinsic time (FIT), and the manifestations of Light and mass. Resoloids are the most fundamental building blocks of Reality formed from the “dark” energy of QS.

    There is "no place" that is without exotic "dark" energy as is heuristically demonstrated with the two-dimensional geometry of Tini Circle Groups. (TCG).

    The geometry of space must be contained; thus, it cannot be "continuous and smooth" or a continuum as assumed by standard model (SM) theories; just as, the counting of "time," itself, as presumed in the fundamental concepts of SM theory, cannot be "continuous and smooth"; as, "time" fundamental relies upon pulsation.

    "Time" is a process of "counting" interruptions of various "clocks." The unit of the most fundamental "clock" is the Conceptual Unit, which manifests as the interruptions (pulses) of the Pulsoid.

    It is well understood that a pool of water that appears as a continuous medium, is not; as is the situation with the air we breathe. Water and air consist of discrete molecules, atoms, and smaller, hyper-relativistic, subatomic phenomena; so in a sense, water and air are similar with "space" that is therefore referred to as a quanticized Dyosphere rather than with a term that connotes "emptiness." Interesting, such a consideration, as the Dyosphere, leads to a much more rational understanding of “gravity” than the ridiculous metaphysical concepts of Newton and Einstein. There is little doubt that both Newton and Einstein were as bewildered concerning gravity as Feynman.


    ©Copyright 2005-2008 by Brunardot. All rights reserved.
    Terms: Dialogue21.com, Brunardot, and Pulsoid Theory must be cited.
    Sorry! This Thread has not been completed.
    Please Bookmark and return to this site often.

    If there is an immediate need for information,
    please e-mail directly at the below "Click" link.

    Please note that any private correspondence
    may be edited and anonymously posted unless
    requested otherwise.

    Every effort will be made to expedite a reply
    with the requested information.
    Please ask questions.
    With questions it’s possible to know if
    comments are logical and convincing;
    or whether clarification is required.
    .....
    ..........
    ..........If images don’t display, "click" the Refresh Icon.
    ..."Click" to E-mail Me Directly
    ......Or, use a Forum Private Message

    ....."Seek simplicity; and
    ....... . . Natural integers."

    ..........Challenge to Academe
    ...The Purpose of Pulsoid Theory
    ..........
    ...........Forum Designer

  • #2
    Re: The Dyosphere

    The famous Michelson-Morley experiment has recently been performed to a level of accuracy much higher than the original experiment performed in 1887.

    Many interpret the results as discrediting the existence of a "luminiferous aether", and demonstrating that the speed of light is constant in all directions. The argument is that if there were an aether, it would have been detected as a shift in positions of the interference fringes of two light beams that are made to interfere with one another in the experiment (which is not observed). The same argument is used to justify the idea that the speed of light is constant in all directions.

    If the "Dyosphere" as you describe exists, why can't we detect it in the Michaelson-Morley experiment? Is there any empirical way to verify its existence, or must one derive the concept from first principles of Pulsoid Theory?
    To create is divine

    Comment


    • #3
      The precision of accuracy is still not at a level...

      Originally posted by ste
      The famous Michelson-Morley experiment has recently been performed to a level of accuracy much higher than the original experiment performed in 1887.
      The precision of accuracy is still not at a level where the dissipating pulse rate of Light can be detected.

      Originally posted by ste
      Many interpret the results as discrediting the existence of a "luminiferous aether", and demonstrating that the speed of light is constant in all directions.
      There is nothing more ludicrous than trying to argue with philosophic logic that the speed of light can be constant. Einstein developed this myth when it was not known that the galaxies were receding; not to mention, accelerating in their recession.

      To base the deceleration of the speed of light on ludicrous logic when little was understood about the Cosmos, and almost nothing about the Nature of light; and, the measurement of minuscule change at the slow, anthropic scale, is an excellent example of the laughable state of 21st century theoretical physics.

      Originally posted by ste
      The argument is that if there were an aether, it would have been detected as a shift in positions of the interference fringes of two light beams that are made to interfere with one another in the experiment (which is not observed). The same argument is used to justify the idea that the speed of light is constant in all directions.
      Can you understand how ridiculous this statement is when you consider the minuscule "tick" of fundamental, intrinsic time (FIT) when your observations are at the anthropic scale???

      Originally posted by ste
      If the "Dyosphere" as you describe exists, why can't we detect it in the Michaelson-Morley experiment?
      The M-M experiment is not capable of detecting such a minuscule change in such a high speed. Why did theoretical astrophysicists not know the galaxies were receding at an accelerating rate until the early ‘90s? There is more to it however: Why do academic, theoretical physicists also insist upon the acceptance of their four mythical forces (or five, or three); etc. etc., etc.???

      Originally posted by ste
      Is there any empirical way to verify its existence, or must one derive the concept from first principles of Pulsoid Theory?
      All that exists is closely related/entangled; and, there is no other current logic which can symbolically explain Universal physical knowledge as a whole better than Pulsoid Theory. The choice between Standard Model theory and Pulsoid Theory is certainly your choice to make; just as many believe in the Easter Bunny, the tooth fairy, and other myths of faith without supporting logic . . .
      ..."Click" to E-mail Me Directly
      ......Or, use a Forum Private Message

      ....."Seek simplicity; and
      ....... . . Natural integers."

      ..........Challenge to Academe
      ...The Purpose of Pulsoid Theory
      ..........
      ...........Forum Designer

      Comment

      Working...
      X